Tag: small business

Small Business Optimism Virtually Unchanged in August

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) said that small business owners’ sentiment declined marginally, down from 94.1 in July to 94.0 in August. This suggests that perceptions have not shifted much over the past few months, with the Small Business Optimism Index averaging 94.0 over the past four months (May to August). This compares to an average of 90.3 for the first four months of 2013 (January to April). So, while small businesses were more confident in August than earlier in the year, growth in optimism appears to have stalled more recently.

Beyond that, the index remains below 100, its threshold for stronger growth in the small business sector. This means that small business owners continue to worry about weaknesses in the economy. The last time the NFIB’s index has a reading over 100 was October 2006.

The percentage of respondents saying that the next three months were a “good time to expand” declined from 9 percent to 7 percent. Of those saying that it was not a good time for expansion, the economy and political environment were the main reasons. Respondents said that higher taxes were the “single most important problem,” cited by 23 percent of those taking the survey. This was followed by government regulations (21 percent) and poor sales (17 percent).

On this latter item, those surveyed suggested that both earnings and sales were lower in the prior three months, with both figures dropping sharply in August. For instance, the net percentage of actual sales (e.g., those saying it was higher minus those saying it was lower) declined from -7 percent in July to -24 percent in August. The good news was that respondents were more positive about the next three months, with the net percentage of sales expectations increasing from 7 percent to 15 percent.

Employment followed a similar pattern. Over the past three months, the net percentage of actual hiring declined from -1 percent to -3 percent. Yet, net hiring expectations for the next three months were more upbeat, up from 9 percent to 16 percent.

Chad Moutray is the chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Small Business Owner Sentiment Edged Slightly Lower in June

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) said that small business owners’ sentiment declined slightly, down from 94.4 in May to 93.5 in June. Even with this month’s lower figure, it is clear that small businesses have become more optimistic in the past few months, with an average Small Business Optimism Index of 93.3 in the second quarter of 2013 versus an average of 89.7 in the first quarter. This could suggest an upward trend. But, we should also caution that the index’s average in the first half of 2012 was also 93.5, but it declined significantly in the second half of the year to 90.9 as we approached the fiscal cliff and had slower sales growth both domestically and globally.

This is not to suggest that we will have a similar fate this year, as other surveys have indicated some cautious optimism about the second half of 2013. Still, the data show that uncertainties continue to persist for small business leaders. The net percentage of respondents expecting sales to increase over the next three months fell from 8 percent to 5 percent, with continued weakness in earnings. In addition, the net percentage saying that the next three months are a good time to expand dropped from 8 percent to 7 percent. (It is still higher than the 4 percent observed in April.)

The main reasons cited for those suggesting that the next three months were not a good time to expand were economic conditions and the political climate. The single most important problems in this survey were taxes and government regulations, with each garnering 20 percent of the responses. The next closest concern was poor sales, a proxy for the economy.

The data did provide some positive news on hiring, which is welcome. The net percentage of those planning to add employees in the next three months increased from 5 percent to 7 percent, its fastest pace since August and a definite improvement from the zero reading in March.

Similarly, capital spending plans for the next three to six months were unchanged, with 23 percent of respondents planning to make a capital expenditure. This figure has averaged 23.3 percent so far in the first six months of 2013, marginally higher than the 22.2 percent average for all of 2012. This suggests a slight pickup in investment spending in recent months, starting with the February report.

Chad Moutray is the chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Small Business Owner Optimism Improves, But Stays Sub-Par

The National Federation of Independent Business said that small business owner confidence edged slightly higher to begin the new year. The Small Business Optimism Index rose from 88.0 in December to 88.9 in January. Nonetheless, it is hard to paint these figures in a positive light, particularly with low readings for three straight months. In October, the index stood at 93.1 before plunging to 87.5 in December. Recent gains still suggest sub-par levels of optimism, with owners remaining anxious about the economic and political environment.

There was a net percentage of 6 percent of respondents suggesting that the next three months were a good time to expand. Of those saying tht it was not a good time, economic and policy concerns were most pressing. Indeed, the most important problems — each garnering 21 percent of responses — were taxes and government regulations. The tax challenge that confronts many small business owners would be the higher tax rates faced by many of them resulting from the fiscal cliff deal. Poor sales were cited by 19 percent.

Many of the key indicators remain weak, even as some of them had marginal improvements for the month. For instance, the net percentage of those experiencing sales gains in January was -9 percent, a slight bit of progress from the -15 percent and -10 percent levels seen in the prior two months. Similarly, the percentage of respendents expecting the economy to improve stayed extremely low (-30 percent), and measures for earnings, prices, hiring, and capital spending continue to be sluggish.

Overall, the NFIB data indicate that small business owners remain pessimistic in January. Given the important role that small firms play in our nation’s economy, that is a troubling sign. Historically, Optimism Index readings of 100 or more were consistent with a healthy and growing small business sector, and we remain well below those levels.

Chad Moutray is the chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Small Business Confidence Higher in October, But With Persistent Sales Concerns

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) reported that its Small Business Optimism Index edged slightly higher in October, up from 92.8 in September to 93.1 in October. Even with the higher confidence level, small business owners remain anxious about the current economic environment. The net percentage of respondents saying that the next three months would be a good time to expand was unchanged at 7 percent. Of those saying that it was not a good time, the main reasons were economic conditions and the political climate. The latter answer is most likely a proxy for the election and the fiscal cliff.

Adding to these worries, small business sales have been moving in the wrong direction since June. The net percentage of owners reporting actual sales increases versus decreases has been negative since then, and it was -15 percent in October. In addition, earnings levels also remain weak, hiring intentions continue to be low, and firms’ ability to raise prices appears to be constrained. Just 22 percent of owners plan to make capital expenditures in the next three to six months.

Along these lines, the single most important problem – cited by 22 percent of respondents – was poor sales. This was followed closely by taxes (20 percent) and government regulations and red tape (19 percent). The inability of political leaders to solve the fiscal cliff is more than likely a major factor in both rising uncertainties regarding the future as well as the fact that “taxes” continue to be cited as one of the more pressing concerns.

In short, the NFIB survey provides us with a mixed bag of economic news as it pertains to small business owners. On the one hand, whether you compare to the last few months or last year, small business confidence has clearly risen. In October 2011, for instance, the Small Business Optimism Index stood at 90.2. Yet, it is also clear that owners remain anxious, with slowing sales and worries about the fiscal cliff. The Index was 94.5 just six months ago (April), and we remain well below the threshold of 100 which would indicate a growing small business sector.

Chad Moutray is the chief economist at the National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Small Business Confidence Continues to Rise

The National Federation of Independent Business released is monthly Small Business Economic Trends this morning, with Small Business Optimism rising from 92.0 in November to 93.8 in December. It was the fifth consecutive monthly gain, up from 88.1 in August.

Along with the gain in confidence, the net percentage of respondents saying that the next three months are a “good time to expand” has increased to 10, its highest level since before the recession. Likewise, small business owners are also more optimistic about future sales, employment and capital spending.

Nonetheless, it is important to note that small businesses remain anxious despite these improvements. Traditionally, small businesses are experiencing strong growth once the Optimism Index exceeds 100 – a threshold that it has not surpassed since 2006. Moreover, of those suggesting that now is not a good time for expansion, poor economic conditions and an unsettling political climate are cited. The single most important problem continues to be “poor sales” followed by taxes and government regulations.

Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Small Businesses Remain Wary About the Economy

Despite some progress in overall economic conditions since the recess, small business owners remain anxious about the economy. These concerns have had real impacts on the smaller firms’ willingness to invest in their businesses, hire additional workers, or seek additional capital.

Given that smaller businesses have traditionally led economic growth coming out of a recession, the fact that this is not happening this time around is hampering employment and economic growth. Two recent surveys have highlighted this fact.

First, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce conducted it’s annual Small Business Outlook Survey. Nearly half of small businesses, defined as those with under $25 million in annual sales, felt that economic uncertainty was their top concern. Other top challenges included fiscal efforts to address the federal deficit and debt, government regulations and the Health Care law.

In addition, 64 percent intended to keep the same number of employees over the next year, with 19 percent planning additional hiring. Interestingly, despite negative views on the national economy, almost two-third report that their own businesses are “on the right track.”

Earlier today, the National Federation of Independent Business released its Small Business Optimism Index, which fell from 90.9 in May to 90.8 in June. While virtually the same as the previous month, the index reflects continued wariness on the part of small business owners. Over half of the respondents who suggested that the next six months were not a good time to expand, said that economic conditions were the reason. The top concern remains “poor sales.”

Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Newly Serious Budget Debate or Same Old Talking Points?

Budgets and deficits and debt dominated the Sunday TV news-chat shows, and the partisans brought us a mixture of principled arguments and same old talking points.

Unfortunately, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) favored the latter in his appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” From the transcript:

SENATOR CHARLES SCHUMER: You need to share sacrifice. And we believe that, for instance, defense cuts should be greater than Ryan proposed. You can’t– there’s waste there like everywhere else. And even more importantly there have to be revenues. If you’re going to reduce the deficit, how do you allow the oil companies to get huge subsidies? Which was based on a time when oil was seventeen dollars a barrel not a hundred? How do you give tax breaks for multimillionaires and companies that send jobs overseas and yet decimate middle class programs? So it’s got to be–
BOB SCHIEFFER (overlapping): You’re– you’re– you’re talking–
SENATOR CHARLES SCHUMER (overlapping): –fair. It’s got to be fair and across the board.
BOB SCHIEFFER: But you say it’s got to include revenues so you’re talking about raising taxes?
SENATOR CHARLES SCHUMER: Well, there are revenues in terms of oil company liabilities. There are revenues in terms of tax breaks to corporations that go all overseas. But I think many of us feel that tax breaks for millionaires is part of that shared sacrifice absolutely.

These were the same bogus arguments made against extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts last year, and Schumer’s attacks on “tax breaks for millionaires” are just a repeated bid for raising taxes on small business. Remember:

  • More than 70 percent of manufacturers file as pass-through entities and pay taxes at the individual rate. (See here and here.)

The accusations against oil companies are also old hat, as well as representing terrible tax, energy and economic policy. A study performed by Wood MacKenzie for the American Petroleum Institute last year reported, as per API: “Raising taxes on the industry with no increase in access could reduce domestic production by 700,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day (in 2020), sacrifice as many as 170,000 jobs (in 2014), and reduce revenue to the government by billions of dollars annually.”

Sen. Schumer’s policy prescriptions are not good, but what’s interesting is that they have also proved to be bad politics. Remember how the debate extending over the 2001 and 2003 turned out in last December’s lameduck session of Congress?

From The White House, Dec. 17, 2010, “The President Signs the Tax Cut & Unemployment Insurance Compromise: “Some Good News for the American People this Holiday Season.”

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


The Realities of the Estate Tax, the Reasonable Compromise

House leadership has pulled the rule for consideration of H.R. 4853, the tax compromise, over liberal Democratic members’ unhappiness with how it would deal with a separate vote on the estate tax. The confusion may delay a final vote on the bill. (Reuters, WSJ blog.)

The delay allows us the opportunity to post the transcript from last night’s PBC NewsHour, which featured a debate over the estate tax between Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-ND), the chief House backer of the higher tax rates. Brady did a good job of cutting through the rhetoric. Like the manufacturers, Brady supports a permanent repeal of death tax but regards the tax bill’s provisions as a compromise.

REP. KEVIN BRADY: Well, I think the death tax is wrong, and as close to a moral — immoral a tax as we have.

There’s something wrong about family farmers, family-owned businesses working their whole life to build up a nest egg, some of them working generations to do that, and then when they die have the government swoop in and take as much as half of everything that they have earned.

I think the death tax needs to go away permanently. Short of that, I think the common ground that was reached that exempts a lot of our family farms and family-owned businesses and taxes others at a 35 percent rate, that wasn’t created, that number didn’t come up from Washington.

That came from our local farmers, our local small business people, our local newspapers and grocery store owners, who said, if you can’t eliminate it completely, this will allow many of us to survive.

So I think that common ground is what we ought to stick with. And I don’t think 45 percent — I don’t think the government deserves half of what our hardworking Americans spent their life to build up.

And … (continue reading…)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Senator Thune on Tax Increases, Manufacturing and Jobs

The Senate’s entire debate Saturday on extending the current tax rates to avoid raising taxes on targeted income groups was obviously important to manufacturers. The National Association of Manufacturers issued a statement from our Executive Vice President Jay Timmons, “Manufacturers Oppose Tax Increases on Business“:

Manufacturers oppose the Senate’s amendment to the Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2010 because it would result in a tax increase for the vast majority of America’s small and medium manufacturers. The tax relief enacted in 2001 and 2003 played a key role in stimulating our economy as it repealed the estate tax and lowered both the individual tax rates and tax rates on investment. 

Yet in searching The Congressional Record’s account of the debate, we find just a single mention of the word “manufacturers.” Thanks to Sen. John Thune (R-SD) for the citation in his floor remarks, refering to medical device manufacturers, as well as the broader discussion of how the “millionaires’ tax” is really a tax on small business. Excerpt:

[Here] we are today debating what evidently has become the Democratic economic theory, which is to raise taxes to create jobs. We have seen this in play throughout the last couple of years. The cap-and-trade bill was a tax on energy. It didn’t get through the Senate because we were prepared to stop it, but it passed in the House of Representatives and was headed here. The health care bill raised taxes on medical device manufacturers and drug companies and health insurance plans, all of which is going to get passed on to small businesses in the form of higher insurance premiums. 

Here we are debating a frontal, direct tax increase on small businesses. It is the most astounding theory on how to create jobs I have ever seen–raising taxes to create jobs. That hasn’t worked in practice. The Senator from Iowa eloquently pointed out that, historically, if you go back over the past half century, not only does it not create jobs, it doesn’t generate additional revenue. As he pointed out, when you raise taxes, you don’t get more revenue. When you lower taxes, you get more revenue. Why? Because it affects the behavior of the American people. It affects investors, it affects the allocation of capital, and it affects people across this country when they know their tax rates are going to be low. (continue reading…)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Arizona Dreaming, Becoming a Reality for California Manufacturers

Here’s latest report from Joseph Vranich, who keeps his list at The Business Relocation Coach blog.
California Companies Moving Away or Shifting Work Out Reaches New Record: 158
(for 2010 alone)
:

In the three weeks since my last tally, I’ve learned about another 14 companies that have left California completely or re-directed capital to build facilities out of state. The names of the 14 and justifications for listing them appear below. Today’s entry builds upon the Sept. 21 entry 144 Companies Shrink from Calif. This Year – Three Times the Total for All of 2009.….

Five enterprises represent the type of operations coveted by many California politicians — “green” companies — namely DayStar Technologies, Vetrazzo, SMA America LLC, Enfinity Corp., and Power-One. Those companies have opted for Georgia, Arizona, Colorado and an apparently as-yet-undetermined “overseas location.”

But wasn’t California supposed be the goldenest of golden states for environmentally sensitive companies? If the incentivizing, subsidizing, speechifying and blandishments fail to keep companies from abandoning the state — or establishing their new operations elsewhere — what does that suggest about the federal government pursuing the same policies?

California’s unemployment rate in September was 12.4 percent.

More from Jan Norman, The Orange County Register’s columnist on small business:

Here’s the website of ”Yes on 23,”, the California Jobs Initiative, to suspend California’s global warming mandates until the state’s economy and employment recover.

In a news release, Lucy Dunn, President and CEO of the Orange County Business Council said:

Very simply, if we don’t pass Proposition 23, businesses will be forced to lay off workers so that they have the money to pay for expensive new state rules and regulations. California alone shouldn’t bear the brunt – or the cost – of fighting global warming. As a single state, we can’t solve global climate issues, and we certainly shouldn’t put people out of work at such a difficult economic time.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


A Manufacturing Blog

  • Categories

  • Connect With Manufacturers

            
  • Blogroll