Tag: manufacturing

We Must Continue to Fight to Protect the First Amendment

NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons warned of the assault on the business community’s right to advocate its priorities in his Member Focus column. A right guaranteed to all political actors by the First Amendment regardless of their point of view.

Last Friday Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered a speech to the American Enterprise Institute about the growing threats against the First Amendment.  He warned specifically about government agencies’ attempts to prevent speech, “Right now, there’s an effort over at the FCC to get groups that buy campaign ads to disclose their supporters. This is utterly irrelevant to the mission of the FCC. We need to say so. The SEC is under pressure right now to force publicly-traded companies into disclosing all their political spending, even though it has no core interest in knowing what political causes companies support. This proposal doesn’t protect shareholders, and it doesn’t lead to better corporate governance.”

As Senator McConnell urged in his speech, we must continue to fight against and call out attacks on the First Amendment regardless of the target. Our nation is the strongest when all voices can be heard in the political process and none are singled out or discouraged.

The NAM will continue to work to protect the First Amendment rights of manufacturers and their ability to participate in the political process. Manufacturers have the right to weigh in and voice their concerns about policies impacting their businesses and their ability to create jobs. Continued efforts in Congress to weaken First Amendment protections will only hurt our democracy.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Happy 150th Birthday to Bayer

Congratulations and happy birthday is in order for Bayer. This week the company is celebrating 150 years of science for a better life. The company was founded in 1863 and ever since the company has been innovating and finding ways to manufacture products to make the lives of people, animals and even plants healthier.

Bayer is now a global company with more than 110,000 employees. Modern manufacturing is full of stories just like that of Bayer. Manufacturers are the drivers of innovation throughout the globe. These innovations include agriculture products, vehicles and earth moving equipment to high tech computers and pharmaceutical products to heal the sick.

To celebrate this anniversary Bayer has planned activities worldwide throughout the rest of 2013. These events will focus on the company’s employees and their families and the communities the company serves.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.5/5 (2 votes cast)


Technology Is Driving Manufacturing Innovation

As the manufacturing army descended upon Washington this week for the 2013 NAM Manufacturing Summit, one of the key issues discussed with policymakers is the need to improve America’s infrastructure. Additional investment in our nation’s infrastructure, in particular our communications and broadband infrastructure is necessary.

A modern and advanced infrastructure will help drive our nation’s innovation and economy forward, especially when it comes to manufacturing.

“Manufacturing is driving technology, and technology and innovation drive manufacturing,” said NAM Technology Policy Subcommittee Chair and Verizon Vice President of Entertainment and Tech Policy Eric Fitzgerald Reed. “Machine-to-machine (M2M) technology and the Internet of Things are increasingly relevant and important components of manufacturers’ operations, including global supply chains. The manufacturing community is bringing all aspects of the Internet ecosystem together from different sectors of the economy to ensure robust broadband infrastructure is in place so businesses can thrive and grow.”

Verizon has launched two innovation centers located in San Francisco, CA and Waltham, MA to help spur innovation, build collaborative partnerships with other NAM member companies and create cutting-edge technology solutions.

It’s important that members of Congress understand that everyone from manufacturers to policymakers, need to work together if we are going to build the infrastructure systems that allow manufacturers to compete and create jobs.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)


Manufacturing Leadership Essential to Good Policy

Over 500 manufacturers took to the Hill on Wednesday, and at the tip of the spear of our manufacturing army was Greg Folley, Vice President of Remanufacturing & Components Division for Caterpillar, Inc.

Four key issues – tax reform, comprehensive immigration reform, energy policy, and infrastructure – that are important to manufacturers, including Caterpillar, took center stage during Greg’s advocacy meetings with several members and staffs representing five states. With Reps. Roskam (IL), Moore-Capito (WV), Guthrie (KY), Smith (NE), and Flores (TX), we found significant areas of agreement, and we certainly got the sense they support the ideas manufacturers have put forth – good news for sure. And that’s why manufacturers took to the Hill for the NAM’s Annual Summit – we’re here to help them get the ball across the goal line.

Each of the candid conversations offered a great deal of back and forth. Greg took the lead in mapping out exactly what manufacturers need and why they need it. As he said, the current tax system is fundamentally uncompetitive and incentivizes companies to shelter in place rather than taking the necessary steps to grow and seek new markets. Lowering the corporate rate and implementing a territorial tax system will allow manufacturers to take off the handcuffs and compete successfully in an increasingly competitive global marketplace. If this happens, we’ll soon see a boom in job creation.

Yet that brings up a second key point – access to the skilled workforce needed to fill those jobs. In leading his meetings, Greg hit the nail on the head, saying that our current immigration system is the equivalent of hanging a “Not Welcome” sign in the window where it should read “Now Hiring.” Essentially the United States is pushing opportunity away, and for manufacturers like Caterpillar, that innovation is not only critical to current success, but also in developing the next generation of technology that will drive growth in the future.

Greg’s visit found a lot of reason to be hopeful for positive policy solutions – but it was abundantly clear that in Washington’s current environment, there remains a lot of work to do. Leadership such as that of Doug Oberhelman, Chairman and CEO of Caterpillar Inc. and Chairman of NAM Board of Directors, Greg Folley, and other manufacturers like Caterpillar is absolutely essential to driving policies that will allow our economy to flourish. And the NAM will consistently be at the door to ensure lawmakers know exactly what they need to do.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.4/5 (7 votes cast)


The Manufacturing Descends on Capitol Hill

Over the past two days the manufacturing army has descended on Capitol Hill to meet with lawmakers about the policies impacting their businesses. I had the privilege of sitting in on a meeting yesterday with Dwayne Welch, executive vice president and chief sales and marketing officer for HSM Solutions based in Hickory, NC as he met with Congressman Patrick McHenry (R-NC).

During the meeting Mr. Welch discussed the need for comprehensive tax reform with Congressman McHenry. Manufacturers currently have the highest corporate tax rate in among developed nations. If manufacturers are going to be able to compete globally and drive our economy comprehensive tax reform is a must.

The need for additional investment in infrastructure was also discussed, as well as comprehensive immigration reform. Manufacturers need access to skilled workers in order to fill many open positions.

Congressman McHenry was very supportive of these critical issues impacting manufacturers. This was just a snap shot of one of more than 200 meetings that took place yesterday and today with members of Congress, their staff and with the Obama Administration.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.0/5 (1 vote cast)


NAM Urges Members of the House to Back Sugar Reform Amendment

Today the NAM sent a Key Vote letter to members of the House urging support for the Pitts/Davis amendment to the Farm Bill which would reform our nation’s sugar program. The U.S. sugar program creates an artificially high domestic price for sugar which harms U.S. food and beverage manufacturers ability to compete.

From the letter:

“A 2006 report by the U.S. Department of Commerce found that for every sugar job saved under the program, three manufacturing jobs are lost. A 2011 report by Iowa State University economists arrived at a similar conclusion, noting that the sugar program annually costs U.S. consumers as much as $3.5 billion and sacrifices 20,000 manufacturing jobs.
The Pitts/Davis/Goodlatte/Blumenauer amendment would eliminate some aspects of current sugar subsidies, especially those added in the 2008 farm bill. It does not repeal the sugar program. However, it would repeal higher price support levels, alleviate trade restrictions that limit the supply of sugar to domestic users and eliminate a requirement that the government buy surplus sugar and sell it at a loss.

Sensible reforms in the amendment would preserve high-paying manufacturing jobs and reduce government-imposed costs on manufacturers. We urge your support.”

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


NY Fed: Improvement in General Business Conditions, But Other Measures Weaken

The New York Federal Reserve Bank said that manufacturers’ perceptions about general business conditions improved in June, even as other measures of activity weakened. The Empire State Manufacturing Survey’s composite index rose from -1.4 in May to 7.8 in June. This good news was somewhat tempered by the fact that there is still a high degree of cautiousness in many of the responses. For instance, nearly half of those taking the survey felt that business conditions had not improved since last month, with 21.6 percent commenting that they were worse.

Indeed, most of the other key subcomponents were lower in June than in May. The new orders index dropped from -1.2 to -6.9. The largest difference between the two months was the percentage that said that their sales had increased, falling from 30.5 percent in May to 23.2 percent in June. (The difference primarily flowed into those suggesting that new orders were the same.) Similarly, the shipments index decreased from 0 to -11.8, and the average workweek index declined from -1.1 to -11.2.

Illustrating just how stalled hiring is right now, the employment index shifted from somewhat modest growth (5.7) to no growth (zero). Roughly 81 percent of respondents said that the number of employees had not changed this month, with the remainder split between positive or negative hiring.

On the positive side, the forward-looking measures remained cautiously optimistic, even as there was some easing in many of the variables. Almost 37 percent feel that new orders should increase in the next six months, with 46.5 percent feeling that they will remain the same. At the same time, employment growth is expected to be increase very slowly (down from 11.4 to 1.6), with capital spending following suit (down from 22.7 to 3.2). Technology investment has actually turned negative this month (down from 11.4 to -3.2), with 83.9 percent planning to make no changes.

In short, the Empire State Manufacturing Survey is our first glimpse at June sentiment among manufacturers. Unfortunately, the data are more pessimistic than positive, with continued weaknesses in the sector. We will get data from the Philadelphia Fed on Thursday. They will hopefully improve from last month’s contracting levels.

Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Manufacturers Ask the Executive Branch to Invest in Energy Efficiency

Today the NAM, several member companies and a number of other organizations sent President Obama a letter expressing our strong support for the continuation of the administration’s effort to reduce the federal government’s energy consumption. The federal government is the largest single user of energy in this country and many federal buildings are in need of upgrades and improvements.

In 2011 the President issued a Presidential Memorandum directing agencies to use $2 billion of private sector financing and expertise to upgrade federal buildings. Under this directive federal managers could utilize energy savings performance contracts (ESPC) and utility energy service contracts (UESC) to purchase energy efficiency upgrades by using gains from energy savings. ESPC and UESC pose no risk to the federal agency because the results are guaranteed and the contractors assume the risks.

To use a military term , the federal government is a “target rich” environment for these upgrades. A number of energy audits have been completed by federal agencies and to date more than $9 billion in addressable energy efficiency measures have been identified, and no doubt there are still more that will be identified in the coming years. We would like the President to again challenge the Executive Branch to identify and contract for $1 billion each year for the next five years in energy saving projects using performance-based contracting. The letter also request that the Executive Branch identify and develop a “best practices” program so that individual agencies can share their successes and their challenges.

We think this makes a lot of sense. This effort will keep the momentum going in the agencies, it will allow the federal government to improve and modernize infrastructure, and it will enhance energy security. All this and it will be done by using energy savings and not with appropriated tax payer dollars.

Manufactures have been leaders in energy efficiency both in the manufacturing of equipment and the utilization of equipment. We understand that a kilowatt saved is a dollar saved. Lowering our energy consumption not only allow us to better utilize our financial resources and but in many instances it helps us to be more productive using less energy. These savings impact the bottom line and help manufacturers to be more competitive in the global economy. Being energy efficient is simply smart!

Chip Yost is assistant vice president of energy and resources policy, National Association of Manufacturers.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Producer Prices Jump 0.5 Percent in May

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that producer prices for finished goods jumped 0.5 percent in May. As such, raw material costs bounced back somewhat from the 0.6 percent and 0.7 percent losses, respectively, in February and March. This shifted the year-over-year rate up from 0.6 percent last month to 1.7 percent now. Despite the uptick, pricing pressures overall still remain modest.

The higher figure stemmed both from increases in both food and energy prices. The cost of finished energy goods rose 1.3 percent, partially offsetting the 3.4 percent and 2.5 percent declines in the prior two months. This increase is consistent with the rise in the price of West Texas intermediate crude rose from an average of $92.02 per barrel in April to $94.51 in May. Meanwhile, food prices were 0.6 percent higher after an up-and-down year so far where costs have been higher one month only to fall the next. The largest food price increases were for fruits, vegetables, dairy, eggs, and fish.

Outside of food and energy, producer prices were up only slightly. Core inflation – which excludes food and enrgy costs – rose 0.1 percent in May, with a year-over-year pace of 1.6 percent.  This number is important, as it indicates that inflationary pressures remain below the Federal Reserve Board’s stated target of 2 percent or less. With the next Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) scheduled for June 18 and 19, this data will become more relevant. The expectation is that the FOMC will continue to pursue its “highly accommodative” policies, even as it might taper the level of asset purchases that it conducts each month from its current $85 billion to something less than that. (continue reading…)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


House Holds Hearing on Background Ozone

Yesterday, the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Subcommittee on the Environment, held a hearing to examine the achievability of potential new ozone standards. The EPA, which substantially lowered the Ozone Standard in 2008 and then unsuccessfully tried again in 2010, is widely expected to propose lowering the Ozone Standard even further at some point this year. As witnesses from the scientific, legal, academic and state regulatory community testified today, achieving a lower standard in many parts of the country will be nearly impossible – if not completely impossible – because of naturally occurring ozone or ozone that is beyond the control of any U.S. regulatory agency (known as “background”).

Ozone can travel several thousand miles and concentration levels are greatly impacted by, amongst other things, topography and weather. However, after EPA sets an air quality standard, like the Ozone Standard, states have limited tools with which to achieve these federal mandates. So manufacturers end up bearing the brunt of the costs, even in areas where there are very few industries. In fact, several national parks, with no industrial activity at all, have been found to be in “nonattainment”.

The situation will be particularly vexing in the Western United States, where ozone attributable to pollution from Mexico and several Asian and European countries contributes significantly to higher ozone measurements. Many of these regions are rural areas of the country with few industries, yet according to EPA would be classified as “nonattainment” and left with little hope of future economic development. As EPA considers lowering the Ozone Standard this year, potentially bringing nearly the entire country into nonattainment, serious consideration should be given to the impact background ozone levels have on nonattainment determinations and the impacts a lower ozone standard could have on manufacturers across the country.

Greg Bertelsen is director of energy and resources policy, National Association of Manufacturers.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


A Manufacturing Blog

  • Categories

  • Connect With Manufacturers

            
  • Blogroll