Bloomberg notes the NAM and Chamber of Commerce’s opposition in the article, “Business Groups Press Lawmakers to Oppose Health-Care Measure, as well as:

“The measure would drive up labor costs to the point of forcing job losses,” the National Retail Federation said in its letter. “A ‘transparent procedural ploy’ for passing the package would harm Congress’s reputation.”

Caterpillar Inc., the world’s largest maker of construction equipment, in a letter said the measure would raise its cost by $100 million in the first year.

“We can ill afford cost increases that place us at a disadvantage versus global competitors,” wrote Gregory S. Folley, vice president and chief human resources officer at Peoria, Illinois-based Caterpillar, in the March 18 letter.

More …

• Dow-Jones, “UPDATE: Groups Make Final Push To Influence Health Bill Vote“
• MarketWatch, “Pros, cons take last shot at health-care bill“

We previously posted the NAM’s key vote letter in opposition.

And, in case the thought crossed your mind, no, House leadership did not find a way to use the reconciliation process to sneak tort reform into the health care bill. Total dollars spent on medical liability reforms? Zero.

From Overlawyered.com, a Capitol Hill source reports on the “tort reform” language in the Senate manager’s amendment to the health care bill primarily serves opponents of tort reform:

The “tort reform” section of Senator Reid’s substitute amendment is not merely meaningless, but is actually a significant giveaway to the trial lawyers. It is essentially a 5-year, 50-million dollar grant program to encourage states to develop more plaintiff-friendly alternatives to the current medical liability system.

Previous versions of the bill contained mere “Sense of the Senate” language expressing support for state demonstration projects.

The provisions run from page 344 to 359: “SEC. 399V-4. STATE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES TO CURRENT MEDICAL TORT LITIGATION.”