NBC Nightly News on Sunday ran a segment on the thousands available jobs in Bismarck and the rest of North Dakota, attracting out-of-state residents for jobs in health care, IT, energy, manufacturing and construction.

Energy has driven economic growth in the state, thanks to coal and, since earlier this decade, oil and gas development from the Bakken formation. An e-mailer — not me — expounded on NBC’s misdirected coverage today at National Review’s The Corner blog:

I think it would be important to point out to everyone, that ND’s job growth is fueled by the oil boom in that state from the Bakken shale formation. The video ignores that fact because it doesn’t fit the MSM’s sense of justice to grow our economy by doing something evil like developing our natural resources.

A hundred-year supply of natural gas has just been discovered in the last couple of years in the Marcellus Shale which underlies much of PA, NY and to a lesser extent other eastern states. If these states are open to the development of the natural gas like ND has been to the oil, they could enjoy the same economic situation. Unfortunately for the laid-off blue collar workers from those industrial states, the elitist environmental-minded politicians and ngo’s will likely block the potential economic boom.

To drill and produce the natural gas you need, drill rig hands, welders, electricians, road builders, general construction crews, engineers, petroleum geologists, environmental scientists (to do it cleanly), regulators (to make sure it is done cleanly), truck drivers, accountants, bankers and more. In addition to all those directly employed by an oil and gas boom, add all the support services those new people to an area need. Oil or gas booms can literally be like gold rushes of Western lore.

We don’t think the anti-energy forces will win in the end, but they’re definitely trying with the usual fear and falsehoods.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette covered the Marcellus Shale’s potential in a major Sunday business piece, “Natural gas locked in the Marcellus Shale has companies rushing to cash in on possibilities“:

According to a report released in July by Penn State’s College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, the Marcellus Shale helped create more than 29,000 new jobs in Pennsylvania in 2008. Of those, about 14,000 were directly related to Marcellus development. The remainder were created by what the study calls “indirect and induced impacts,” such as a restaurant near a drilling site hiring more staff because it is serving a larger lunchtime crowd.

The study predicts more than a decade of dramatic growth, with more than 48,000 new jobs this year, then another 98,000 in 2010.

By 2020, the study says, Marcellus development could add $13.5 billion to the state’s economy and create more than 176,000 new jobs in a single year.

NAM President John Engler is expected to talk about new natural gas developments in remarks tomorrow at the State Chamber of Oklahoma’s public affairs conference. Oklahoma is home to the Woodford Shale deposit.

The natural gas industry group, Energy in Depth, has lots more information on shale gas at its website, www.energyindepth.org.

UPDATE (2:45 p.m.): Now that you’re considering a move to Bismarck, take a look at Bismarck Tribune’s excellent website. Most popular stories:

It’s about 0 degrees there at the moment, but the big Midwestern storm passed it by.

Following up on yesterday’s Senate EPW hearing on energy policy and the states, where North Dakota Gov. John Hoeven called for a comprehensive national energy strategy (see post), the good people at Energy in Depth pass on an exchange the governor had with Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK):

Key Excerpts From Yesterday’s U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Hearing
Dialogue starts at 101:50.
Click HERE to view.

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK):  “Governor Hoeven, the thing I was going to bring up is there’s a lot of discussion, when you talk about your offset capabilities there, and what you’re doing, that’s great. We’re doing somewhat the same thing, although most of ours is marginal production. But there is a, I’d suggest to you, the use of hydraulic fracturing is necessary in your state to be able to explore, to retrieve all these oil capabilities.”

Gov. John Hoeven (R-ND):  “It’s absolutely vital. You know, you mention some of these new formations. They are not, uh, the oil isn’t connected. You’ve got to go underground. And you’re talking two miles underground. And make a fracture in order to get the oil to flow. That’s vitally important.”

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK):  “I wanted to get that into the record, because there are some efforts to do away with hydraulic fracturing, and it would be devastating.”

Just so. Energy in Depth has been a strong voice defending hydrofracturing technology, in which pressurized water is pumped in subterranean strata to make the oil or natural gas accessible via drilling. Without hydrofrac, development of the Bakken Formation oil as well as our vast natural gas resources in Texas (Barnett Shale) and Pennsylvania/New York/Ohio (Marcellus Shale) would be prohibitively expensive.

The activist group, ProPublica, has been leading a bizarre campaign against the widely accepted technology, and by offering its agenda-driven reporting for free has been successful in getting newspapers to publish the articles. Apparently if it’s gratis, editing is optional.

This is a telling observation from an Energy in Depth rebuttal, which explains why we refer to ProPublica as an activist outlet, not a journalistic venture, “Separating Fiction from Invention in ProPublica’s Latest Anti-HF Attack Piece“:

Earlier this week, ProPublica author Abrahm Lustgarten released the latest installment in his series of advocacy pieces attacking the commonly used energy technology known as hydraulic fracturing. Instead of simply running on the ProPublica blog and website, however, the article was co-published with Politico and appeared in the paper’s news section (a letter to the editor from Energy In Depth policy director Lee Fuller will appear in the paper this Tuesday).

It wasn’t the first time that a mainstream news outlet provided ProPublica with a platform for this kind of product - although, for papers such as the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the determination has been made that ProPublica articles, when run, are more appropriately filed on its “opinion/perspectives” page than as part of its straight-news reporting.

Prior to its release, Energy In Depth spoke at length with Mr. Lustgarten about the direction of the (presumably already written) piece and the myriad mistakes he was making in issuing a blanket indictment of recent government and third-party reports finding that EPA regulation of hydraulic fracturing would cost Americans jobs, revenues and future security.  

Regrettably, none of those explanations made it into his final piece.

 And regrettably, ProPublica appears to be a model for future journalistic ventures.

As previously noted, this blogger once worked for Gov. John Hoeven. But it’s been eight years now.