Tag: Election 2012

Looking Beyond Politics

Quick – who is ahead today in the polls?

Hey….did you hear the latest gaffe from the presidential candidates?

Remember when the President said “You didn’t make this?” Or when Governor Romney said “I can’t convince them to vote for me?

What about the latest stories the spouses told about their presidential candidate husbands’ early years in elementary school?

Here’s my question:  “Who cares?”

The media and political strategists seem to revel in spending countless hours of coverage on meaningless and trivial matters regarding the presidential race, and other campaigns for that matter.  Coming from a newspaper family (my mother was the publisher of my hometown paper), I am truly saddened at how media coverage has devolved into often times nothing more than entertainment.

With all due respect to the ravenous appetite to fill time in the 24/7 news cycle, we need to cut through the chatter.  America’s economy is at stake.  Indeed, America is at stake.

It’s time for Americans to take charge again.  And you can be on the front lines to do exactly that.

It is not an overstatement to say that this election is the most important of our lifetimes. That’s something we hear nearly every two years, but no other in our lifetimes has implications that will last generations as does this one.

Will we be a nation that embraces and cheers the free market, entrepreneurial spirit and capitalistic risk-taking that has made our country the freest, strongest and most prosperous in the history of the world?

Or will we become sedentary spectators who allow the federal government to squelch the fire of ingenuity by continuing to demonize success and forcing ever more reliance on a Washington bureaucracy that seems intent on diminishing the values of hard work and personal responsibility?

That is the choice we will make on Tuesday, November 6.

The NAM recently released a poll we commissioned with the National Federation of Independent Business.  The shocking results of the survey found that a whopping 55% of small businesses and manufacturers would not start their business today because of the burdens Washington places on them.

How can America’s economy recover and thrive in the future if our government policies discourage investment and risk?  When companies indicate they won’t expand and won’t hire because of our uncompetitive tax policies, our oppressive regulatory regime and the looming fiscal cliff, is anyone in Washington listening?  It sure doesn’t seem like it.

Against that backdrop, Americans will go to the polls and decide whether Barack Obama or Mitt Romney is the better leader to meet these challenges. Who has the best record – not the best rhetoric – to do the job?

For the past several months, both candidates have fallen over each other attempting to claim the mantle of the most supportive of manufacturing.  And the reason is clear – a strong and growing manufacturing base, with its outsized multiplier effect, is essential to growing the rest of our economy and fixing our nation’s addiction to deficit spending.

Their visions, however, differ radically, especially on issues that have a significant impact on manufacturing. And it isn’t difficult to figure out that the results will be vastly different.

The middle class has been affectionately wooed by both candidates on the issue of taxes.  But manufacturers get lost in the debate when President Obama calls on raising taxes on individuals of a certain income level.  No less than two-thirds of manufacturers – mostly small and medium sized companies – pay taxes as individuals, and they are already struggling to meet payroll.

Both candidates have called for comprehensive energy policies premised on an “all-of-the-above” strategy; yet “all of the above” means something different to each. Governor Romney, for example, makes room for the Keystone XL pipeline in his plan. It’s missing in the President’s approach.  And with much fanfare, Mr. Obama routinely calls for raising taxes on energy producers, which will ravage consumers – from senior citizens to manufacturers.

On regulations, Governor Romney has vowed to scale back the current Administration’s regulatory excesses, a task easier said than done. Many rules are mandated by statute or judicial decree, so a President’s authority to roll them back is limited. But it is certainly the right philosophy.  In the past, neither party has proven to be a model of restraint – some 2,000 have been imposed on manufacturers in the past 30 years.

There is a lot at stake – for manufacturers, for our economy, and for future generations of Americans.  So the next time someone asks you about an errant remarks at a debate, or tells you how great one of the candidates looks surrounded by their family, politely ask them this:  “Have you had a chance to compare the candidates on the issues? Do you know where they stand on taxes, on regulation, on energy and other issues that matter to our economy?”

The NAM’s Election Center has those answers, from the Presidential candidates, to those running for the Senate and the U.S. House. Share this site and the information with your colleagues and those in your community.  We need an informed and educated electorate to ensure pro-manufacturing policy is front and center after the election.

The key to our success starts with you.  Please vote and encourage your employees, your family and your friends to do the same.

Quite simply, America is at stake.

Jay Timmons is president and CEO, National Association of Manufacturers

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)


Gibbs and Rove Spar Before Manufacturers

While President Obama and Governor Romney may have finished their debates, veteran political strategists Karl Rove and Robert Gibbs went head-to-head during the NAM’s fall board meeting.

Gibbs, a long-time aide to President Obama and a current advisor to his campaign, highlighted the President’s record, pointing to, for example, the half-million manufacturing jobs created since December 2009. The President will win over middle-class voters because he “understands the problems that they face,” Gibbs said.

Rove went on attack against the President’s record, rattling off a series of policies that are detrimental to job creators.  “This Administration has a weird view of what it wants to economy to be like,” said the former advisor to President George W. Bush.

As the nation learned in 2000, the outcome of a presidential election can hinge on just a few votes.  Every vote counts!  And it’s not just the presidential race.  There are a number of House and Senate races that will come down to the wire. For more information about the races and candidates where you live, visit the NAM’s Election Center.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


With Conventions Over, Time To Put Policy Over Politics

Just as he did in his State of the Union address eight months ago, President Obama again put manufacturing front and center last night in his nomination acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention.

He touted some achievements of his term—new manufacturing jobs and three new free trade agreements—but then laid out a new challenge for the next four years: creating one million manufacturing jobs.

That’s a laudable goal, but it’s clear that something has to change. President Obama simply rehashed some of the policies of his current administration—growing exports, for example (which we, of course, support). But manufacturers need bolder policy prescriptions. After all, the jobs report this morning reflected that manufacturing lost 15,000 jobs last month. If the status quo isn’t working now, why should Americans expect more of the same to lead to one million new jobs?

Of course, the first step in creating one million jobs is to stop going backwards. But that is exactly what is going to continue happening in a few months if our leaders don’t decisively deal with the impending fiscal abyss. The fiscal abyss means job losses for small and medium-sized manufacturers as a result of tax increases as well as job losses for innovators in the defense industry, who will be hit hard by indiscriminate cuts that will do little to solve our long-term fiscal challenges. Add to that the significantly mounting regulatory costs on manufacturers, and the result is a business climate that stifles job creation.

Neither candidate offered policy specifics these past two weeks. Over the next two months, they should. The problems facing manufacturers are abundantly clear, and manufacturers want to hear what both candidates plan to do to solve them.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Trade Growth Essential for Manufacturing Renaissance

NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons is blogging from the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte this week. 

Jay Timmons makes remarks at an NAM/Politico event on jobs and the economy. / Photo by David Bohrer

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) kicked off its week at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) today. Just as we did in Tampa, we are partnering with Politico, and today we hosted an event featuring a number of top policymakers who are attending the DNC.

Delaware Governor Jack Markell joined Rep. Brad Miller of North Carolina and former Rep. Susan Molinari, who is now a government affairs executive with Google, at the Politico Hub. White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer also participated, as did Austan Goolsbee, former chairman of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors.

The panelists gave a nod to manufacturing as a bright spot in the economic recovery, but news this morning once again demonstrated that we have a lot of work ahead of us. Manufacturing contracted in August, the third month in a row. Reflecting on the global economic uncertainty, Goolsbee commented, “Most any country in the world would rather have our problems.”

But that is little consolation to the 8.3 percent of Americans who are unemployed, and the millions more who are underemployed.  The United States did not achieve its economic leadership by default—because our competitors were worse off.  We did so by out-innovating and out-working them, feats made possible by our system of free enterprise.

Economist Austan Goolsbee fields questions at an NAM/Politico event on jobs and the economy. / Photo by David Bohrer

One tenet of free enterprise is free trade, and a topic that came up repeatedly during the panel discussion today was trade. Ninety-five percent of the world’s consumers live outside of the United States. Reaching these customers is critical for manufacturers’ growth, yet obstacles stand in the way of increased exports.

For one, many nations have tariffs or other trade barriers that make products from the U.S. less competitive. The U.S. can help bring these barriers down through free trade agreements. But right now, out of the dozens of trade pacts being negotiated around the world, the U.S. is party to just one.

Revitalizing the nation’s trade agenda is one part of a pro-growth plan to strengthen manufacturing and grow jobs and the economy. The NAM has an agenda that will lead the way.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Manufacturing Can Lead the Way Toward 12 Million New Jobs

NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons is blogging from the Republican National Convention in Tampa this week.

Last night, Mitt Romney wrapped up the Republican Convention and succinctly summed up what this election is about.  “What America needs is jobs,” he said. “Lots of jobs.”

Jobs are indeed what will get voters to the polls.  Unemployment has stood over 8 percent for 42 consecutive months—that spans President’s Obama’s entire presidency.  Worse still, millions more Americans are working in jobs for which they are overqualified, not getting the full benefit of the skills they have worked so hard to acquire.

Governor Romney promised to create 12 million jobs, and while he did not single out manufacturing, he did lay out a number of priorities for manufacturers. He talked about an “all-of-the-above” energy plan—though he did not use that term—but it was clear what he meant when he talked about “taking full advantage of our oil and coal and gas and nuclear and renewables.”

He talked about new free trade agreements, a key priority if American manufacturers are to reach the 95 percent of consumers who live outside the United States.  President Obama deserves credit for seeing the Colombia, Panama and South Korea trade pacts through to completion, but our country’s trade agenda has since stalled.  We need to get it moving again.

Romney talked about providing our young people with the skills they need to succeed in the modern workplace and simplifying and modernizing our complex and onerous regulatory system.  Both are important to manufacturers’ ability to grow and create jobs.

Now it’s on to Charlotte, where President Obama and his supporters will have their chance to make the case for another term.  President Obama will undoubtedly defend his record, but manufacturers are also expecting to hear what he plans to do if voters decide to extend his stay in the White House.

Eight percent unemployment and stagnant economic growth is unacceptable, and with the elections just two months away, manufacturers expect a clear pro-growth vision from Republicans and Democrats alike.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


South Carolina Governor Highlights Manufacturing

NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons is blogging from the Republican National Convention in Tampa this week.

The Republican National Convention kicked off in earnest last night.  The atmosphere in the Tampa Bay Times Forum was electric.

For me, the highlight of the evening was the speech of Nikki Haley, the governor of South Carolina.  The Palmetto State is a great place to manufacture, and the industry has had a significant, positive impact on the state’s economy.  As Governor Haley said, “We build things in the Palmetto State. We build planes. We build cars.”

But it’s not always easy. As the Governor pointed out in no uncertain terms, in recent years, the federal government has put up obstacles to growth in the state.

When the Boeing Company expanded into South Carolina, it was a great opportunity.  Boeing’s billion-dollar investment meant 1,000 new jobs, and it meant that the state would be at the forefront of aerospace innovation, building the new 787 Dreamliner aircraft.

The National Labor Relations Board, however, stepped in and said the investment violated our labor laws, an action that threatened to wipe out Boeing’s investment and the new jobs.  Ultimately, Boeing prevailed, and today the South Carolina facility is up and running.

Governor Haley told this story well last night and offered an incisive perspective about the consequences of government overreach and its impact on a state and its citizens

I’m looking forward to hearing more about manufacturing from the speakers tonight.  In the meantime, the NAM continues to ensure manufacturing remains on everyone’s radar in Tampa.

This morning, I had a conversation with Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who was a manufacturer before coming to the Senate in 2011.  We talked about the devastating impact the fiscal abyss would have on the economy and about the need for Congress to act quickly to avert this threat.

The fiscal abyss is a common theme in Tampa. The issue has come up repeatedly in my conversations with members of the press and media, and given the dire predictions that inaction by Congress could plunge the nation back into a recession, it’s no surprise why.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Leaders Highlight Manufacturing Challenges at NAM-Politico Event

NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons is blogging from the Republican National Convention in Tampa this week.

In a matter of hours, we’ll hear the first speeches at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, but the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) had an early opportunity to hear from some of our nation’s top leaders earlier this afternoon.

Carly Fiorina, Rep. Darrell Issa and Gov. Bob McDonnell discuss jobs and the economy at the RNC in Tampa, Fla./Photo by David Bohrer

The NAM has partnered with the Politico newspaper to host policy events with political and business leaders in Tampa and Charlotte. Today, Governor Bob McDonnell of Virginia, Congressman Darrell Issa of California and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina talked about the challenges job creators face and the policies that will get our economy moving again.

Manufacturing is clearly a priority in the economic recovery.  After all, it has the highest multiplier effect of any other industry. Every dollar invested in manufacturing generates another $1.35 in economic activity. What’s good for manufacturing is good for our entire economy.

McDonnell, Issa and Fiorina each talked about the impediments that job creators face in this country and singled out taxes and regulation as challenges—sentiments that echo what manufacturers have been saying. As the recent NAM/Industry Week survey of manufacturers found, 64 percent of manufacturers cite the unfavorable business climate created by taxes and regulation as their biggest challenge.

Competitive tax and regulatory policies would go a long way toward restoring our economy to full strength. With the right policies, like those outlined in the NAM’s Manufacturing Renaissance, manufacturing will lead the economic resurgence and put Americans back to work.

The NAM-Politico event was great opportunity to highlight manufacturing and its crucial role in our nation’s future.  That’s why the NAM is attending the conventions: To make sure that the national conversation about manufacturing continues into November and beyond.

Our collaboration with Politico is just part of our efforts. This morning, I talked about the policy challenges manufacturers face and what we are looking for from both presidential candidates on CNBC’s Squawkbox.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)


A Manufacturing Blog

  • Categories

  • Connect With Manufacturers

            
  • Blogroll