Manufacturers appreciated the highlight of the industry from the President last night. And, as long-time advocates for pro-growth tax reform, we were glad to hear the President calling for “comprehensive” reform, that is an effort that includes both corporate and individual tax reform.
While many larger manufacturers operate in corporate firm, about two-thirds of manufacturers—mostly small and medium-size companies—operate as a “flow through” and are taxed as individuals. Unfortunately, the good news on taxes stopped there.
The President made clear that he looks at tax reform as a way to help “bring down the deficit.” The NAM, on the other hand, doesn’t view tax reform as a revenue raiser, but as an engine for much-needed economic growth and competitiveness.
Speaking of competitiveness, we were dismayed to hear the Administration again bring up the illusory “tax breaks for companies to ship jobs overseas.” Manufacturers in the United States know firsthand the challenges of competing in a global marketplace under our outdated world-wide tax system. Making the current system worse—as the President suggested—is going to make manufacturers in America even less competitive. In order to promote competitiveness, we need to move to a territorial tax system, similar to systems in most industrial countries, structured to enhance U.S. competitiveness, not raise additional revenue.
Dorothy Coleman is vice president of tax and domestic economic policy, National Association of Manufacturers.
Latest posts by Dorothy Coleman (see all)
- Brussels’ Bad Idea Is Getting Worse - April 12, 2016
- Treasury Waves a Wand and Makes a Bad Tax System Much Worse - April 5, 2016
- Manufacturers Look to Treasury for Guidance on Global Tax Information Reports - March 22, 2016