The U.S. Supreme Court this morning hears oral arguments in American Electric Power v. Connecticut, an appeal from the Second Circuit ruling that held five utilities could be sued for creating a public nuisance under federal common law because they had emitted greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. Boiled down, the issue is: Should the courts have the ability to raise your electric rates. (This paragraph updated at 1:50 p.m. to more accurately characterize Appellate Court’s ruling.)
From the Scotusblog, “Argument preview: The courts and global warming”:
The Supreme Court will hold eighty minutes of oral argument at 10 a.m. Tuesday on a major challenge to the use of the judiciary to impose controls on “greenhouse gas” emissions that may contribute to climate change, such as global warming. In American Electric Power Co., et al., v. Connecticut, et al. (10-174), the argument for the electric utilities facing “public nuisance” lawsuits will be made by Peter D. Keisler of the Washington, D.C., office of Sidley Austin. Arguing for the federal government in support of the utilities will be Acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal K. Katyal, and for a group of states will be New York’s state Solicitor General, Barbara D. Underwood. The time for argument has been expanded from the usual 60 minutes to 80; the utilities and the government will have 20 minutes each, and the states 40.
- National Association of Manufacturers Manufacturing Law Center case summary.
- National Association of Manufacturers amicus brief. Counsel of record is Richard O. Faulk of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP.
- American Tort Reform Association, “ATRA Brief Urges Supreme Court to Dismiss Global-Warming as Public-Nuisance Case”
- Washington Legal Foundation, Legal Backgrounder, “AEP v. Connecticut: Will The Supreme Court Make Defendants Do “Their Share” To Mitigate Global Climate Change?”
- Natural Resources Defense Council, “The Sky Will Not Fall: Why the Supreme Court Should Let States Sue the …”
- National Journal, “The fight over climate-change policy may move to the judicial branch.” (May?)
- Bloomberg, “White House Joins AEP to Fight Climate Lawsuits With EPA ‘Off its Duff’”
- Journal and Courier (Indiana), “Court to decide whether states can sue utilities over greenhouse gases”
- Detroit News (editorial), “Editorial: Supreme Court should reject global warming case”
- Daily Caller, “Supreme Court to hear major climate change case”
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011