Attorney General Alan Wilson of South Carolina and eight other state attorneys general have a written a sharp letter to the National Labor Relations Board calling on the NLRB to immediately withdraw its complaint against Boeing as “an assault upon the constitutional right of free speech, and the ability of our states to create jobs and recruit industry.”
The AGs’ letter was addressed to Lafe Solomon, the acting general counsel of the NLRB who brought the complaint against Boeing for locating additional production facilities for the 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina instead of Washington State. Solomon’s complaint, brought at the instigation of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, would force Boeing to manufacturer the planes in the Puget Sound area.
From the AG letter (available here):
The right to work, uninhibited by compulsory unionism, is a precious right and is constitutionally enforceable through our states’ right to work laws. See Retail Clerks Int’l v. Schermerhorn, 375 U.S. 96 (1963). Such laws are designed to eliminate union affiliation as a criterion for employment. However, the NLRB, through this single proceeding, attempts to sound the death knell of the right to work. Additionally, this tenuous complaint will reverberate throughout union and non-union states alike, as international companies will question the wisdom of locating in a country where the federal government interferes in industry without cause or justification.
Furthermore, this complaint disrupts, and may well eliminate, the production of Boeing 787 Dreamliners in South Carolina. In fact, Boeing has expanded its operations to meet product demand in South Carolina, while adding new jobs in Washington State. The complaint charges Boeing with the commission of an unfair labor practice, but appears to do so without legal and factual foundation. This unparalleled and overreaching action seeks to drive a stake through the heart of the free enterprise system. The statements of Boeing officials cited in your complaint are the innocent exercise of the company’s right of free speech. The Supreme Court long ago made it clear that the NLRA does not limit, and the First Amendment protects, the employer’s right to express views on labor policies or problems. N.L.R.B. v. Va. Electric and Power, 314 US 469, 477 (1941). As the Court recently reiterated in Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876, 899-90 (2010), a corporation is not a second class citizen in terms of First Amendment protection.
Our states are struggling to emerge from one of the worst economic collapses since the Depression. Your complaint further impairs an economic recovery. Intrusion by the federal bureaucracy on behalf of unions will not create a single new job or put one unemployed person back to work.
The only justification for the NLRB’s unprecedented retaliatory action is to aid union survival. Your action seriously undermines our citizens’ right to work as well as their ability to compete globally. Therefore, as Attorneys General, we will protect our citizens from union bullying and federal coercion. We thus call upon you to cease this attack on our right to work, our states’ economies, and our jobs.
The other attorneys general signing the letter are Ken Cuccinelli of Virginia, Jon C. Bruning of Nebraska, Greg Abbott of Texas, Samuel Olens of Georgia, Pam Bondi of Florida, Luther Strange of Albama, E. Scott Pruitt of Oklahoma and Tom Horne of Arizona.
In a separate letter today, Attorney General Wilson asked members of Congress to support the attorneys general’s request of the NLRB.
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011