Labor Secretary and Lilly Ledbetter Push for Paycheck Fairness Act

At the moment it’s unclear if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will bring the Paycheck Fairness Act up in the Senate before Congress adjourns for the mid-term elections. What is clear is the Administration’s strong support for the legislation that will do little to address actual instances of illegal discrimination. What’s even clearer is that the legislation will not help manufacturers create jobs.

On Tuesday, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and Lilly Ledbetter, the plaintiff in the Ledbetter Supreme Court decisions and political activist who has lobbied for the legislation named in her honor, hosted what was billed as a Department of Labor webcast. Usually Labor Department webcasts are a forum for the public to ask questions of senior Department officials on key issues like the Department’s budget requests and regulatory agenda. Tuesday’s event was much different. This “webcast” was a streaming video feed of a discussion by the Secretary and Ms. Ledbetter on their support for the Paycheck Fairness Act. There were several participants in the audience, assumingly there upon the invitation of the Department. Our invitation must have been lost in the mail. It appeared that most in the room were supporters of the legislation who tossed softball questions to the Secretary.

If I were in the room there would’ve been many questions that I would’ve liked to ask, such as:

  1. Ms. Secretary – you expressed the need to gather more data about the alleged pay gap, however it appears as though the Department of Labor has removed an important analysis of pay equity issues as the Obama Administration transitioned into effect. Wouldn’t it be helpful for the Department to analyze existing research it commissioned?
  2. Ms. Secretary – the Administration continues claim that women’s wages only constitute 77 percent of men’s wages. However your Department recently published updated data that shows that the pay gap is narrowing. Why do you continue to use outdated information?
  3. Ms. Ledbetter- You claim that the Paycheck Fairness would allow employees to freely discuss their paychecks. However isn’t this employee right already protected in the National Labor Relations Act as one of many “protected concerted activities”?
  4. Ms. Secretary – Data from the EEOC shows that 95 percent of discrimination claims against employers do not have grounds. Even though most of these claims are meritless employers still need defend themselves against these costly allegations. Are you concerned that passage of the Paycheck Fairness Act may encourage more suits to be filed against employers that may not have merit?

Join the discussion 2 Comments

  • Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m inspired! Extremely useful information specifically the final section :) I maintain such information much. I used to be seeking this certain information for a long time. Thanks and good luck.

  • MaleMatters says:

    Nothing has worked to close the gender wage gap — not the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act, not affirmative action, not diversity… Nor will the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act work. The wage gap will stubbornly persist because pay-equity advocates stubbornly ignore this:

    Despite feminists’ 40-year-old demand for women’s equal pay, millions of wives still choose to have no pay at all. In fact, according to Dr. Scott Haltzman, author of “The Secrets of Happily Married Women,” stay-at-home wives, including the childless, constitute a growing niche. “In the past few years,” he says in a CNN August 2008 report at, “many women who are well educated and trained for career tracks have decided instead to stay at home.” (“Census Bureau data show that 5.6 million mothers stayed home with their children in 2005, about 1.2 million more than did so a decade earlier….” at Perhaps more women are staying at home because feminists and the media have told them relentlessly for years that women are paid less than men in the same jobs, and so why bother working if they’re going to be penalized and humiliated for being a woman.)

    As full-time mothers or homemakers, stay-at-home wives earn zero. How can they afford to do this while in many cases living in luxury? Because they’re supported by their husband.

    If millions of wives can accept no wages and live as well as their husbands, millions of other wives can accept low wages, refuse to work overtime, refuse promotions, take more unpaid days off — all of which lowers women’s average pay. They can do this because they are supported by husbands who must earn more than if they’d remained single — which is how MEN help create the wage gap. (If the roles were reversed so that men raised the children and women raised the income, men would average lower pay than women.)

    By the way, the next Equal Occupational Fatality Day is in 2020. The year 2020 is how far into the future women will have to work to experience the same number of work-related deaths that men experienced in 2009 alone.

Leave a Reply