<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Latest &#8216;Crude&#8217; Review, Wrong Like Most of The Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/11/05/the-latest-crude-review-wrong-like-most-of-the-others/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/11/05/the-latest-crude-review-wrong-like-most-of-the-others/</link>
	<description>The National Association of Manufacturers Premier Manufacturing Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carter Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/11/05/the-latest-crude-review-wrong-like-most-of-the-others/#comment-14134</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=10476#comment-14134</guid>
		<description>Oh brother. Who cares if Ecuador is a nation of laws?

So how many critical comments you allow on the Amazon Watch blogs there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh brother. Who cares if Ecuador is a nation of laws?</p>
<p>So how many critical comments you allow on the Amazon Watch blogs there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/11/05/the-latest-crude-review-wrong-like-most-of-the-others/#comment-14133</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=10476#comment-14133</guid>
		<description>As usual, Mr. Wood zeroes in on technicalities about the case to argue that the plaintiffs and their supporters are guilty of distortion, while studiously avoiding addressing the real issue at hand: that Texaco (now Chevron) made a colossal mess of the Ecuadorian Amazon between 1964 and 1990.

Who cares if it's technically called a class-action suit according to Ecuadorian law? Ecuador doesn't have a mechanism for a lawsuit to be filed that names 30,000 people as plaintiffs, unfortunately... but the bottom line is if you go to the affected region in Ecuador and ask people in the communities whether they see themselves as represented by the lawsuit, they'll generally say yes. This lawsuit originated with the communities affected by Chevron's pollution, not with scheming lawyers as you seem to think.

Carter, I wrote recently about you and the obfuscation-based style of argument you seem so fond of. You and your readers might be interested: http://bit.ly/5pyDOe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, Mr. Wood zeroes in on technicalities about the case to argue that the plaintiffs and their supporters are guilty of distortion, while studiously avoiding addressing the real issue at hand: that Texaco (now Chevron) made a colossal mess of the Ecuadorian Amazon between 1964 and 1990.</p>
<p>Who cares if it&#8217;s technically called a class-action suit according to Ecuadorian law? Ecuador doesn&#8217;t have a mechanism for a lawsuit to be filed that names 30,000 people as plaintiffs, unfortunately&#8230; but the bottom line is if you go to the affected region in Ecuador and ask people in the communities whether they see themselves as represented by the lawsuit, they&#8217;ll generally say yes. This lawsuit originated with the communities affected by Chevron&#8217;s pollution, not with scheming lawyers as you seem to think.</p>
<p>Carter, I wrote recently about you and the obfuscation-based style of argument you seem so fond of. You and your readers might be interested: <a href="http://bit.ly/5pyDOe" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/bit.ly');" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5pyDOe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/11/05/the-latest-crude-review-wrong-like-most-of-the-others/#comment-13497</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=10476#comment-13497</guid>
		<description>You keep insisting that this is not a class action suit, as if just by force of repetition you could make that true. But it is a class action suit, and you have to know that by now. Even the comment that you link to by the ADC's spokesperson says the opposite of what you're pretending that it says, since all she does is explain that it's called something different in Ecuador but it's the same thing (they don't speak English down there, you know).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You keep insisting that this is not a class action suit, as if just by force of repetition you could make that true. But it is a class action suit, and you have to know that by now. Even the comment that you link to by the ADC&#8217;s spokesperson says the opposite of what you&#8217;re pretending that it says, since all she does is explain that it&#8217;s called something different in Ecuador but it&#8217;s the same thing (they don&#8217;t speak English down there, you know).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Latest ‘Crude’ Review, Wrong Like Most of The Others &#171; The Chevron Ecuador Lawsuit Clearinghouse</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/11/05/the-latest-crude-review-wrong-like-most-of-the-others/#comment-13495</link>
		<dc:creator>The Latest ‘Crude’ Review, Wrong Like Most of The Others &#171; The Chevron Ecuador Lawsuit Clearinghouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=10476#comment-13495</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full article.             Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full article.             Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
