As the NAM’s Shaun Donnelly explained yesterday, the U.S. Trade Representative took a well-justified step against the European Union’s unscientific ban against U.S. poultry products yesterday. (USTR: “United States Requests WTO Panel in Challenge of EU Restrictions on U.S. Poultry Exports“)
Just interesting to see the Canadians taking similar action against U.S. country-of-labeling laws. From AP, “Canada takes US to WTO over cattle, hog labeling“:
OTTAWA — Canada is asking theto intervene in a dispute with the United States over cattle and hog exports.
Ottawa announced Wednesday it has asked a WTO trade dispute panel to strike down country-of-origin requirements it says are making it difficult for Canadian cattle and hog exporters to compete fairly.
The 2002 U.S. farm bill included a requirement that firms identify the origin of products at every stage of production, including retail, which brings in the labeling requirements. From our days in North Dakota government — late ’90s — we can say with confidence the driving force behind the law was U.S. ranchers who objected to competition from Canadian beef. But who can object to labels?
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011