Harold Meyerson, The Washington Post’s most liberal opinion columnist, had a column last week, “Just One Word: Factories,” that boiled down to: Manufacturing is important and the United States should appreciate it more. Eh. Even knowing that Meyerson’s usual policy prescriptions would damage U.S. manufacturing competitiveness, there wasn’t a lot of that in the column, so who could object?
Dan Ikenson at Cato, that’s who. And boy, does he do it with brio. We’ll excerpt at length (asking Ikenson’s indulgence) because he offers facts instead of fallacies. From “Harold Meyerson is Part of the Problem“:
Meyerson makes some claims that cannot be allowed to stand, such as.
“”We don’t [make things] any more – at least, not like we used to. Since 1987, manufacturing as a share of our gross domestic product has declined 30 percent.”
First of all, please note that Meyerson’s second sentence does nothing to support his first. A decline in the manufacturing sector’s share of the total economy speaks to the rapid growth of other sectors of the economy, but says nothing about the change in U.S. manufacturing output or value-added.
According to data from the 2009 Economic Report of the President , as gathered and reported yesterday  by George Mason University Economics Professor Don Boudreaux, since 1987 real U.S. manufacturing output has increased by 81 percent – hardly a sign of manufacturing decline.
The facts  – as reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis – demonstrate that real manufacturing value-added reached a record high level in 2007 (the last year for which final data are available). Notwithstanding the recent recession that has affected all sectors of the economy, U.S. manufacturing has been thriving in recent years.
Second, if the United States doesn’t “make things anymore,” then nobody does. According to data  from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, U.S. factories are the world’s most prolific, accounting for 25 percent of global manufacturing value-added. By comparison, Chinese factories account for 10.6 percent.
That may be hard to fathom, given that everyone’s favorite story about shopping in retail establishments these days is that it’s impossible to find anything labeled “Made in the USA.” But that’s because, increasingly, U.S. manufacturing produces sophisticated components, such as airplane parts, not consumer goods.
American manufacturing is by no means in decline. What should be is Meyerson’s myopic way of seeing things.
Footnotes in the extended entry.
Article printed from Cato @ Liberty: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org
URL to article: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/08/13/harold-meyerson-is-part-of-the-problem/
URLs in this post:
 time: http://www.freetrade.org/node/737
 again: http://www.freetrade.org/node/941
 fallacy-laden diatribe : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/11/AR2009081102934.html
 2009 Economic Report of the President: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/tables09.html#erp3
 reported yesterday: http://cafehayek.com/2009/08/manufacturing-error.html
 facts: http://www.bea.gov/industry/gpotables/gpo_action.cfm
 data: http://www.unido.org/index.php?id=o3474
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011