Card Check: The Arbitration No Choice Act

By July 11, 2009Labor Unions

An op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal by Shikha Dalmia of the Reason Foundation, drawing on the work of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy on binding arbitration for public employees, “The ‘Free Choice’ Act and Binding Arbitration“:

In a dynamic economy, a business’s survival depends upon its ability to constantly cut costs and innovate. But a company forced into binding arbitration will be frozen for two years (the duration of the initial contract) from making any changes to any aspect of its business that is covered by the contract. Literally every issue — from its 401(k) contributions to its reliance on outside labor — could potentially become subject to review by a government panel that has neither the company-specific knowledge nor the incentive to turn a profit.

Businesses are not the only losers in compulsory arbitration. Currently, any contract negotiated by union officials has to be ratified through a vote of rank-and-file members. Under compulsory arbitration, workers do not get this vote. In other words, EFCA will take away the right of workers to vote to form a union, and then binding arbitration will take away their right to vote on a contract.

Leave a Reply