<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPSIA Update: Phthalates No Danger, or Now They Tell Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/04/01/cpsia-update-phthalates-no-danger-or-now-they-tell-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/04/01/cpsia-update-phthalates-no-danger-or-now-they-tell-us/</link>
	<description>The National Association of Manufacturers Premier Manufacturing Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Fasanella</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/04/01/cpsia-update-phthalates-no-danger-or-now-they-tell-us/#comment-9554</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=9054#comment-9554</guid>
		<description>~sigh~

We are quick to criticize those who refuse to acknowledge the errors of their ways (Waxman, Rush et al). Continuing to criticize once said parties reconsider their positions that serve our mutual benefit will only encourage entrenchment of beliefs and estrangement.

I'm a liberal working in manufacturing, neither of which are anything to be ashamed of. I've been a financial supporter of NPR for 25 years and a staunch opponent to CPSIA (I'd be a supporter of NAM but no one responds to my membership queries). I don't see that these are mutually exclusive. Right wing media has it's own "illustrious" history of downplaying CPSIA; you don't have to look further than Fox News for the evidence (http://bit.ly/3B4JO8). 

My point is, this is a bipartisan effort and it's time to look past partisan infighting if we want entrenched politicians and media to reconsider their positions. You cannot point fingers for presumed failures while simultaneously expecting others to willingly stand in line for servings of criticism should they do so. If it's a case of damned if you do and damned if you don't, they lose less face with the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~sigh~</p>
<p>We are quick to criticize those who refuse to acknowledge the errors of their ways (Waxman, Rush et al). Continuing to criticize once said parties reconsider their positions that serve our mutual benefit will only encourage entrenchment of beliefs and estrangement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a liberal working in manufacturing, neither of which are anything to be ashamed of. I&#8217;ve been a financial supporter of NPR for 25 years and a staunch opponent to CPSIA (I&#8217;d be a supporter of NAM but no one responds to my membership queries). I don&#8217;t see that these are mutually exclusive. Right wing media has it&#8217;s own &#8220;illustrious&#8221; history of downplaying CPSIA; you don&#8217;t have to look further than Fox News for the evidence (http://bit.ly/3B4JO8). </p>
<p>My point is, this is a bipartisan effort and it&#8217;s time to look past partisan infighting if we want entrenched politicians and media to reconsider their positions. You cannot point fingers for presumed failures while simultaneously expecting others to willingly stand in line for servings of criticism should they do so. If it&#8217;s a case of damned if you do and damned if you don&#8217;t, they lose less face with the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NPR on CPSIA: &#8220;Public Concern, Not Science, Prompts Plastics Ban&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/04/01/cpsia-update-phthalates-no-danger-or-now-they-tell-us/#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>NPR on CPSIA: &#8220;Public Concern, Not Science, Prompts Plastics Ban&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=9054#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>[...] say the government scientists who studied the problem.&#8221; &#8220;Now they tell us,&#8221; writes Carter Wood. More from Jonathan Adler @ Volokh and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] say the government scientists who studied the problem.&#8221; &#8220;Now they tell us,&#8221; writes Carter Wood. More from Jonathan Adler @ Volokh and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
