From California Manufacturers and Technology Association, a good update about the practical effects of legislating against economic activity in the hubristic belief you can control global temperatures. And this in a state with the highest electricity rates in the country:
Unless Governor Schwarzenegger vetoes SB 1762 (Sen. Don Perata), there’s a good chance that the state’s residential and industrial energy consumers will see the first chunk of increased global warming costs before the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has even finalized a scoping plan that will inevitably put the country’s highest premium on all products that start or end in a greenhouse gas in California.
SB 1762 creates a “Climate Change Institute” that among many things would become California’s greenhouse gas research and development center. The life of the institute will use close to $500 million, in which $370 million will be collected from electricity and natural gas consumers. Until the state reforms AB1X and un-exempts the majority of residential users, only the largest residential and industrial users will pay the cost. With or without an AB1X fix, SB 1762 is just a taste of what’s to come under California’s massive global warming regulation. And here, we come to one of the biggest rubs of all — it’s a “taste” that completely ignores and circumvents CARB’s authority to guide AB 32’s implementation, regulations, costs, and research and development.
The Governor went through more than a year of deliberations and legislative rigor to get AB 32 passed. In the end, the bill delivered the entire plan’s authority to CARB’s greenhouse gas 200-man team. After months and months of intense work, CARB continues to struggle with the broadest and most cost effective manner in which to implement this California-only policy. This bill and new agency would make that challenge harder. There is definitive value in a research and development arm for the state’s massive global warming undertaking, but a half-baked plan that burdens only a select few with the costs of a program that benefits everyone will only hurt consumers and the economy. It undermines the bill’s ultimate goal to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and grow the economy in a state that already has the highest electricity rates in the west.
And, because I’m getting married in a week, how’s this for a matrimonial analogy — it’s like paying for 100 filet mignon dinners before finding out there’s only 70 bucks left in the wedding kitty and the wedding coordinator already purchased porterhouses for everyone … darn, I hope they’re hungry.
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011