<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NAM&#8217;s Statement on the R.I. Lead Paint Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/07/01/the-nams-statement-on-the-ri-lead-paint-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/07/01/the-nams-statement-on-the-ri-lead-paint-ruling/</link>
	<description>The National Association of Manufacturers Premier Manufacturing Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: Rhode Island lead paint decision overturned</title>
		<link>http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/07/01/the-nams-statement-on-the-ri-lead-paint-ruling/#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: Rhode Island lead paint decision overturned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=7030#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>[...] the most comprehensive analysis so far; Walter gives background at Point of Law. The defendants and NAM have released statements; Motley Rice claims they were doing it for the children, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the most comprehensive analysis so far; Walter gives background at Point of Law. The defendants and NAM have released statements; Motley Rice claims they were doing it for the children, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
