Unfortunately, H.R. 6346 would do nothing to address our nation’s energy supply needs. Instead, it would interfere with normal market forces in addressing supply and demand imbalances and could set a dangerous precedent of the federal government artificially pricing goods. History has demonstrated that price controls and allocations simply do not work.
In fact, this bill could have unintended consequences by creating product shortages and even higher gasoline prices for U.S. companies and consumers. It could also restrict energy supplies by creating disincentives to invest in energy production and distribution.
The bill would have the government replace the market in making many costs decisions. From the text:
SEC. 2. UNCONSCIONABLE PRICING OF GASOLINE AND OTHER PETROLEUM DISTILLATES DURING EMERGENCIES.
- (a) Unconscionable Pricing-
- (1) IN GENERAL- It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, at wholesale or at retail in an area and during a period of an energy emergency, gasoline or any other petroleum distillate covered by a proclamation issued under paragraph (2) at a price that–
- (A) is unconscionably excessive; and
- (B) indicates the seller is taking unfair advantage of the circumstances related to an energy emergency to increase prices unreasonably.
The NAM uses its key votes to determine a legislator’s record on manufacturing issues at the end of a congressional session.
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011