From a fundraising e-mail, Union of Concerned Scientists:
Last week, despite overwhelming public support, senate obstructionists were able to block meaningful debate on a bill that would have established a strong framework for reducing U.S. global warming pollution.
So the debate was meaningless, eh?
Have to disagree. The recent debate over the Lieberman-Warner climate change legislation actually provided a bracing dose of reality, forcing the cap-and-trade advocates to abandon the green utopianism and instead address economic specifics…and consequences. The study that the NAM and the American Council for Capital Formation commissioned — and the many other studies done by disinterested parties, as well — brought home the truth that the cap-and-trade, command-and-control regime would have destroyed millions of jobs, sent the price of energy through the roof, and sacrificed U.S. competitiveness to targets and dreams.
A very meaningful debate, indeed.
P.S. Here’s the full e-mail pitch.
Latest posts by Carter Wood (see all)
- Farewell from a Blogger - May 25, 2011
- Activist Ignore Evidence to Back Shakedown Suit Against Chevron - May 25, 2011
- More than a Lawsuit: A Circle of Political Pressure Against Chevron - May 25, 2011