Good, balanced overview story in today’s New York Times on the TVA’s start-up of the Browns Ferry I commercial nuclear reactor. We’ve written about the facility’s return to operation, another positive step forward in the industry’s renaissance, but it’s certainly not a challenge-free (re)birth.
WASHINGTON, May 10 — The Tennessee Valley Authority plans to reopen its Browns Ferry 1 nuclear reactor this month — 22 years after it was shut for safety reasons and 5 years after extensive renovations began.
The move reflects the increased interest in nuclear power as an energy source, but the government agency’s willingness to spend $1.8 billion on the overhaul — almost as much as a new plant is supposed to cost — also shows just how hard companies think it will be to build a new plant.
Nuclear power has to be part of the U.S. energy future; in remarks today NAM President John Engler said a reasonable goal was to increase the country’s percentage of nuclear-derived electricity from the current 20 percent to 40 percent. Consumer and industry demand, coupled with current environmental expectations, make that goal eminently achievable — hard, but achievable — especially if policymakers and regulators are serious about energy and the economy.
Latest posts by NAM (see all)
- Manufacturers Win Several Website Design Awards - June 15, 2011
- China Makes Commitments on Trade, Intellectual Property - December 16, 2010
- ITC Details Widespread Theft of Intellectual Property in China - December 14, 2010