Two great pieces in today’s Wall Street Journal on one of our favorite topics. The first is their lead editorial. As they say in the first sentence, “Two scientific events of note occurred this week, but only one got any media coverage. Therein lies a story about modern politics and scientific priorities.”
The first event, of course, is the much-ballyhooed Stern report, (not not that Stern), which has the over-hyped mainstream media in an even greater frenzy, if that’s possible. The second is a conference on global priorities organized by respected writer, economist and environmentalist Bjorn Lumborg. The editorial introduces a lengthy op-ed from him on the topic of the Stern report. In it, he says:
“Despite using many good references, the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is selective and its conclusion flawed. Its fear-mongering arguments have been sensationalized, which is ultimately only likely to make the world worse off.”
OK, we’ll admit we haven’t read the 700-page tome either, but Lumborg did and has some great insights.
Both of these pieces are a must-read for anyone interested in a little balance in the coverage of this story — obviously not including ABC.
Latest posts by NAM (see all)
- Manufacturers Win Several Website Design Awards - June 15, 2011
- China Makes Commitments on Trade, Intellectual Property - December 16, 2010
- ITC Details Widespread Theft of Intellectual Property in China - December 14, 2010