Hmmmm…. Wonder who’s writing the WaPo editorials these days? Perhaps Sebastian Mallaby, the same guy who already showed his misguided stripes yesterday. Well, they’re back today talking about us “abolitionists” in an editorial, and they’re still wrong. We’ve said before that our small manufacturers saddled with this tax are often forced to sell the company, thereby eliminating jobs and livelihoods in the process. Indeed, many of our manufacturers have commented and have written to the Post to make this point. The Post’s rejoinder is jaw-dropping in its stupidity:
“Suppose that the estate tax does force the sale of some farms and businesses; is that necessarily a bad thing? Well, it would mean that the heirs don’t have the inclination or ability to manage the farm or the small business and turn a profit — otherwise they would earn enough to pay the tax….From the standpoint of job creation, it’s a mistake to leave a farm or small business in the hands of heirs who don’t know how to turn a profit on it; better that those assets be sold to purchasers who will maximize their value. Far from promoting a vibrant small-business and farm sector, the abolition of the estate tax would increase the number of businesses and farms that are managed by non-vibrant sons and daughters.
For the record, yes it is a bad thing as you’ll see from the many comments posted on this topic. These are people who have generated livelihoods and wealth for their employees. For the Post to dismiss it with the backs of their rhetorical hands is just flat irresponsible.
Latest posts by NAM (see all)
- Manufacturers Win Several Website Design Awards - June 15, 2011
- China Makes Commitments on Trade, Intellectual Property - December 16, 2010
- ITC Details Widespread Theft of Intellectual Property in China - December 14, 2010