The WaPo weighs in again on the effect of immigration on wages. However, once again, the WaPo isn’t reading the WaPo. You might have seen our post a week or so ago, quoting the Post editorial — correctly — on the non-effect of immigration on wages. We supplemented that piece with one from Diana Fuchtgott-Roth saying essentially the same, and backing it up with a host of studies. As the WaPo pointed out in its editorial, folks who disagree (like ABC News) all point to one study — by a Mr. Borjas — from Harvard. But his study has been debunked, as Furchtgott-Roth points out in her piece and as the WaPo also noted.
Nonetheless, today’s WaPo article entitled, “Effect of Immigration on Jobs, Wages is Difficult for Economists to Nail Down“, writer Nell Henderson cites Borjas and lands far from the mark, and from the WaPo’s own editorial view. In fact, as you’ll see from the pieces cited above, it’s not difficult for economists to nail down, and it’s not much of an effect.
Latest posts by NAM (see all)
- Manufacturers Win Several Website Design Awards - June 15, 2011
- China Makes Commitments on Trade, Intellectual Property - December 16, 2010
- ITC Details Widespread Theft of Intellectual Property in China - December 14, 2010