Interesting WaPo editorial yesterday on Gale Norton, their view of beauty. They were — as usual — left of us but right of the NY Times. (Is anyone ever left of the NY Times except maybe Mother Jones….?) They hemmed and hawed a little bit about her tenure but finally concluded that she “never successfully brokered a compromise” between business and enviros on some tough issues. They end up accusing her of leaving behind “bitterness and division”. But here’s the rub: all the bitterness and division came from the enviros and the left. To the extent she was unable to brook any compromise, it was because they wouldn’t have any of it. Where will they allow us to drill, to explore, to tap our resources of oil and natural gas? Nowhere, that’s where. So much for compromise.
Gale Norton had a great tenure, did the right thing. The enviros’ man lost the election so they didn’t get their hand-picked person at Interior. Instead they got a fair-minded person who was committed to ending our dependence on foreign oil and on tapping our own resources in an environmentally safe way. And the enviros are still steamed about it.
Latest posts by NAM (see all)
- Manufacturers Win Several Website Design Awards - June 15, 2011
- China Makes Commitments on Trade, Intellectual Property - December 16, 2010
- ITC Details Widespread Theft of Intellectual Property in China - December 14, 2010